The New America Foundation
FEBP
Data
Background & Analysis
Blog
About
In the News
State:
-- Choose your state --
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
District:
-- Select a district --
Aberdeen 06-1
Agar-Blunt-Onida School District 58-3
Alcester-Hudson 61-1
Andes Central 11-1
Arlington 38-1
Armour 21-1
Artesian-Letcher 55-5
Avon 04-1
Baltic 49-1
Belle Fourche 09-1
Bennett County 03-1
Beresford 61-2
Big Stone City 25-1
Bison 52-1
Bon Homme 04-2
Bonesteel-Fairfax 26-5
Bowdle 22-1
Brandon Valley 49-2
Bridgewater 43-6
Britton-Hecla School District 45-4
Brookings 05-1
Burke 26-2
Canistota 43-1
Canton 41-1
Carthage 48-2
Castlewood 28-1
Centerville 60-1
Chamberlain 07-1
Chester 39-1
Clark 12-2
Colman-Egan 50-5
Colome 59-1
Conde 56-1
Corsica 21-2
Custer 16-1
Dakota Valley 61-8
De Smet 38-2
Dell Rapids 49-3
Deubrook 05-6
Deuel 19-4
Doland 56-2
Douglas 51-1
Dupree 64-2
Eagle Butte 20-1
Edgemont 23-1
Edmunds Central 22-5
Elk Mountain 16-2
Elk Point-Jefferson 61-7
Elkton 05-3
Elm Valley 06-2
Emery 30-2
Estelline 28-2
Ethan 17-1
Eureka 44-1
Faith 46-2
Faulkton 24-2
Flandreau 50-3
Florence 14-1
Freeman 33-1
Garretson 49-4
Gayville-Volin 63-1
Gettysburg 53-1
Grant-Deuel 25-3
Greater Hoyt 61-4
Greater Scott 61-5
Gregory 26-4
Groton Area School District 06-6
Haakon 27-1
Hamlin 28-3
Hanson 30-1
Harding County 31-1
Harrisburg 41-2
Harrold 32-1
Henry 14-2
Herreid 10-1
Hill City 51-2
Hitchcock-Tulare School District 56-6
Hot Springs 23-2
Hoven 53-2
Howard 48-3
Hurley 60-2
Huron 02-2
Hyde 34-1
Ipswich 22-3
Iroquois 02-3
Isabel 20-2
Jones County 37-3
Kimball 07-2
Lake Central 39-2
Lake Preston 38-3
Langford 45-2
Lead-Deadwood 40-1
Lemmon 52-2
Lennox 41-4
Leola 44-2
Lyman 42-1
Marion 60-3
Mccook Central 43-7
Mcintosh 15-1
Mclaughlin 15-2
Meade 46-1
Menno 33-2
Milbank 25-4
Mitchell 17-2
Mobridge 62-3
Montrose 43-2
Mount Vernon 17-3
New Underwood 51-3
Newell 09-2
Northwest 52-3
Northwestern 56-3
Oelrichs 23-3
Oldham-Ramona 39-5
Parker 60-4
Parkston 33-3
Pierre 32-2
Plankinton 01-1
Pollock 10-2
Polo 29-2
Rapid City 51-4
Redfield 56-4
Rosholt 54-4
Roslyn 18-2
Rutland 39-4
Scotland 04-3
Selby 62-5
Shannon County 65-1
Sioux Falls 49-5
Sioux Valley 05-5
Sisseton School District 54-2
Smee 15-3
South Shore 14-3
Spearfish 40-2
Stanley County 57-1
Stickney 01-2
Summit 54-6
Tea Area School District 41-5
Timber Lake 20-3
Todd County 66-1
Tri-Valley 49-6
Tripp-Delmont 33-5
Vermillion 13-1
Viborg 60-5
Wagner 11-4
Wall 51-5
Warner 06-5
Watertown 14-4
Waubay 18-3
Waverly 14-5
Webster 18-4
Wessington Springs 36-2
West Central 49-7
White Lake 01-3
White River 47-1
Willow Lake 12-3
Wilmot 54-7
Winner 59-2
Wolsey 02-5
Wood 47-2
Woonsocket 55-4
Yankton 63-3
Print friendly
CSV download
Home
ยป
States
South Dakota
Overview
All indicators
Comparisons
Notes
South Dakota
Comparisons
Funding
41st
Per Pupil Expenditure Rank 2007
Demographics
27th
Student Poverty Rate 2007
Achievement
22nd
4th grade math proficiency rank (NAEP 2007)
Achievement
26th
4th grade reading proficiency rank (NAEP 2007)
Feedback and Questions
You can leave a message using the contact form below.
E-mail address:
*
Message:
*
Funding
National
SD
% Difference
Per Pupil Expenditure 2007
Total school system expenditures in a state divided by fall enrollment, which includes funds from federal, state, and local sources spent on day to day operating expenses like teacher salaries, but not capital expenses like school construction.
$9,683
$8,064
-17%
Per Pupil Expenditure Rank 2007
Rank of average state per-pupil expenditure among 50 states and DC where 1 represents the highest per pupil expenditure.
N/A
41st
District School Finance Inequity 2007
Average percentage difference in per-pupil spending among school districts across a given state. The per-pupil expenditure for school districts is compared to the average per-pupil expenditure for the state and weighted according to size and poverty level.
N/A
13.3%
District School Finance Inequity Rank 2007
Rank of the average percentage difference in per-pupil spending among school districts across a given state where 1 indicates the least equitable.
N/A
18th
Federal Revenue Per Pupil 2007
Federal revenues divided by fall enrollment as reported in the state finance file, found in the CCD National Public Education Financial Survey.
N/A
$1,462
Title I 2009 Estimated
Title I of the No Child Left Behind Act authorizes direct aid from the federal government to states and school districts to support the additional education needs of children from low-income families.
N/A
$43,747,031
IDEA Part B 2009 Estimated
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) authorizes direct aid from the federal government to states and school districts to support the additional education needs of children with disabilities.
N/A
$32,664,950
School Nutrition Funding 2007
Total funding each state received for meals and commodities under the National School Lunch Act to provide free or low cost meals to low income students.
N/A
$28,680,946
Medicaid Reimbursements 2007
Total federal funding for school based health services, administration, and transportation provided to special education students under Medicaid.
N/A
$6,744,000
Total Estimated Stimulus Funds
Total amount of money each state is expected to receive in funding from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in 2009 and 2010, including Title I, IDEA, SFSF and other programs. Funds first became available in 2009.
N/A
$205,239,793
Demographics
National
SD
% Difference
Student Poverty Rate 2007
Number of children in a state ages 5 to 17 living beneath the Census Bureau's poverty line. In 2007, the poverty income threshold for a family of four was $20,050.
16.5%
15.0%
-9%
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Enrollment 2007
Number of students in the state certified to receive free or reduced price lunches based on family incomes or participation in Food Stamp or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families programs.
41.8%
28.9%
-31%
Special Education Participation 2007
Number of children in a state who have Individualized Education Plans under IDEA law.
12.7%
14.6%
+15%
Percent English Language Learner 2007
English Language Learner data reflect the number of children in a state who qualify as Limited English Proficient according to state law.
5.0%
N/A
White Students 2007
Number of students enrolled in public education in the state that are categorized as white.
55.0%
84.5%
+54%
African American Students 2007
Number of students enrolled in public education in the state that are categorized as African American.
16.6%
1.7%
-90%
Hispanic Students 2007
Number of students enrolled in public education in the state that are categorized as Hispanic
21.1%
2.1%
-90%
Asian Students 2007
Number of students enrolled in public education in the state that are categorized as Asian.
4.6%
1.0%
-78%
American Indian Students 2007
Number of students enrolled in public education in the state that are categorized as American Indian.
1.2%
10.6%
+799%
Achievement
National
SD
4th Grade Math 2007 NAEP
Percent of students scoring proficient or above on grade-level proficiency standards made by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).
39%
41%
4th Grade Reading 2007 NAEP
Percent of students scoring proficient or above on grade-level proficiency standards made by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).
33%
34%
8th Grade Math 2007 NAEP
Percent of students scoring proficient or above on grade-level proficiency standards made by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).
32%
39%
8th Grade Reading 2007 NAEP
Percent of students scoring proficient or above on grade-level proficiency standards made by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).
31%
37%
4th Grade Math 2007-08 NCLB
Percent of 4th graders scoring proficient or above in math according to state-defined proficiency standards for each grade, used for No Child Left Behind accountability.
N/A
79%
4th Grade Reading 2007-08 NCLB
Percent of 4th graders scoring proficient or above in reading according to state-defined proficiency standards for each grade, used for No Child Left Behind accountability.
N/A
89%
8th Grade Math 2007-08 NCLB
Percent of 8th graders scoring proficient or above in math according to state-defined proficiency standards for each grade, used for No Child Left Behind accountability.
N/A
76%
8th Grade Reading 2007-08 NCLB
Percent of 8th graders scoring proficient or above in reading according to state-defined proficiency standards for each grade, used for No Child Left Behind accountability.
N/A
80%
High School Math 2007-08 NCLB
Percent of 10th or 11th graders scoring proficient or above in math according to state-defined proficiency standards for each grade, used for No Child Left Behind accountability.
N/A
67%
High School Reading 2007-08 NCLB
Percent of 10th or 11th graders scoring proficient or above in reading according to state-defined proficiency standards for each grade, used for No Child Left Behind accountability.
N/A
69%
Nationally Defined Graduation Rate 2007
Four year freshman cohort graduation rate as calculated by the U.S. Department of Education.
74%
83%
State Defined Graduation Rate 2007
High school graduation rate as calculated by the state.
N/A
90%